<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPL and ExtJS for Intranets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codemonkeyism.com/archives/2008/04/23/gpl-and-extjs-for-intranets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codemonkeyism.com/archives/2008/04/23/gpl-and-extjs-for-intranets/</link>
	<description>Programming is hard</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkeyism.com/archives/2008/04/23/gpl-and-extjs-for-intranets/#comment-86184</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/04/23/gpl-and-extjs-for-intranets/#comment-86184</guid>
		<description>IANAL and I'm out of my waters. But a standard GPL should not be a problem for extranets.  But that is just the common understanding of the GPL as I see it, Ext LLC seems to see this different.

The AGPL would be another thing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License

"The GNU AGPL is similar to the GNU General Public License, except that it has an additional section to cover use over a computer network. "

This was probably what they ment but for some reason didn't use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IANAL and I&#8217;m out of my waters. But a standard GPL should not be a problem for extranets.  But that is just the common understanding of the GPL as I see it, Ext LLC seems to see this different.</p>
<p>The AGPL would be another thing:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The GNU AGPL is similar to the GNU General Public License, except that it has an additional section to cover use over a computer network. &#8221;</p>
<p>This was probably what they ment but for some reason didn&#8217;t use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vick</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkeyism.com/archives/2008/04/23/gpl-and-extjs-for-intranets/#comment-86180</link>
		<dc:creator>Vick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/04/23/gpl-and-extjs-for-intranets/#comment-86180</guid>
		<description>How about extranets? As in a publicly available web site?

How about password-protected web sites (such as an online banking application for instance)?  

What is your understanding about the GPL in these cases if we use extJs?  Thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about extranets? As in a publicly available web site?</p>
<p>How about password-protected web sites (such as an online banking application for instance)?  </p>
<p>What is your understanding about the GPL in these cases if we use extJs?  Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
