Code Monkeyism

Programming is hard by Stephan Schmidt

Paul Graham is priceless

“Character sets are a peripheral matter. The only reason they loom so large in the average programmer’s life is that, though trivial, they’re an enormous time suck. Trivial + time consuming. Sounds like a good thing to postpone.”

He has absolutely no clue about unicode. I and every other Java developer has been using unicode for more than 10 years now, and beside some i18n issues, I/O and String comparisons, they are a non issue if the language supports them.

One is always a bit sheepish about writing quick and dirty programs. And yet some, if not most, of the best programs began that way. And some, if not most, of the most spectacular failures in software have been perpetrated by people trying to do the opposite.

.

This renders all the discussions lately just mood. PG has no experience with software development, engineering, maintenance, or anything else except writing cute dirty hacks in Lisp. If he does, enlighten me. His release of Arc doesn’t help.

Update: Take an advice from someone who has written real world applications.

About the author: Stephan Schmidt is currently a team manager at ImmobilienScout24 in Berlin. Stephan has been working as a head of development and CTO. He has used a lot of different technologies in the last 20 years including Java, Rails and Python. Stephans main field of interest is maintainablity and productivity in software development. Want to know more? All views are only his own.

If you did like this article but you don't want to subscribe to new articles with your reader, you can follow me on Twitter or subscribe to new posts with your email:

Leave a Reply